You were robbed in a parking lot, attacked in a stairwell, or attacked outside your own apartment building. The person who did it may never be caught. Even if police make an arrest, a criminal conviction does not pay a single medical bill.
There is a second path, and it runs through the property owner. When a business or landlord ignores a known danger and someone gets hurt because of it, West Virginia law may allow a claim against that owner. A negligent security lawyer looks at what the owner knew, what they did about it, and whether reasonable precautions would have changed the outcome.
Manchin Injury Law Group has spent decades representing injured people and grieving families across West Virginia, from Fairmont and Morgantown to Martinsburg and Charles Town. If a crime on someone else’s property left you hurt, you can contact our team for a free consultation.
Negligent security is a type of premises liability claim. The argument is not that the property owner attacked you. It is that the owner failed to take reasonable security precautions, and that failure left a foreseeable crime possible.
West Virginia once sorted lawful visitors into categories, and each category came with its own level of protection. That framework is gone. In Mallet v. Pickens (1999), the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia abolished the distinction between invitees and licensees and replaced it with a simpler split between trespassers and non-trespassers.
If you were on the property lawfully, you were a non-trespasser, and the owner owed you reasonable care under the circumstances. The standard that applies to your case shapes what has to be proven, so getting it right matters from the first day.
West Virginia does not make property owners automatically responsible for crimes other people commit. No rule here says every owner must post a guard. The law asks something narrower.
Was this crime foreseeable, and did this owner owe a duty to guard against it? The answer depends on the kind of property you were on.
A business that opens its doors to customers takes on a duty to protect them from foreseeable criminal acts of third parties. The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia recognized that duty in Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (1997), a case brought by a woman abducted from a store parking lot. Stores, restaurants, bars, hotels, malls, convenience stores, and gas stations all sit in this group.
Apartment complexes work differently, and the difference catches people off guard. Under Miller v. Whitworth (1995), a landlord does not owe tenants a duty to protect them from third-party crime based on landlord status alone. A duty can still arise in two situations. The first is where the landlord’s own actions or failures unreasonably created or increased the risk. The second is where a special relationship exists between the landlord and the tenant.
In practice, a claim against an apartment complex usually turns on something the landlord did or failed to do: a security gate left broken for months, a lock never changed after a reported threat, or patrols that were promised and then cut.
General awareness that crime happens in the surrounding area does not, by itself, make a specific crime foreseeable. A high neighborhood crime rate is not a substitute for evidence about the property. Proving one of these cases takes property-specific proof, not a statistic about the ZIP code.
Two statutes also shape the analysis. W. Va. Code § 55-7-28 reinstated the open and obvious hazard doctrine, which limits an owner’s liability for plainly visible dangers, while § 55-7-27 limits what an owner owes to trespassers.
Foreseeability comes down to one question. What did the owner know, or what should the owner have known, about the risk before you were hurt?
Answering it takes records, and most of those records belong to the other side. Evidence that tends to establish foreseeability includes:
The distinction that decides these cases is the one between prior crime at the property itself and general crime in the area. The first builds a claim. The second rarely carries one alone.
Most negligent security cases trace back to a short list of preventable failures. Common examples include:
These cases follow property types more than city limits. Apartment and student rental housing, hotels and motels along travel corridors, retail and mall parking lots, bars and nightlife districts, parking garages, convenience stores, and gaming and entertainment venues all come up repeatedly.
Geography shapes the risk. Morgantown pairs a large student rental market with a busy downtown nightlife district, which puts a lot of people in shared housing and late-night pedestrian areas.
Martinsburg sits on the I-81 corridor in Berkeley County, the state’s second-most-populous and one of its fastest-growing counties, with the lodging and retail development that heavy traffic brings. Bridgeport and Clarksburg anchor the retail centers of Harrison County, and Jefferson County draws visitors to gaming and entertainment venues around Charles Town.
Where a claim gets filed depends on where the property sits, which could mean circuit court in Marion, Monongalia, Harrison, Berkeley, or Jefferson County. If your incident happened in one of those areas, our Morgantown premises liability lawyer and Martinsburg premises liability lawyer pages cover those markets in more detail.
Because these incidents involve violence rather than accidents, the injuries tend toward the severe end. Common ones include:
Psychological injury belongs on that list too. Survivors of a violent crime often develop post-traumatic stress, anxiety, panic attacks, or a lasting fear of the place where it happened. Some cannot go back to work. Some cannot go back to the building they live in. That harm is real, and it can be part of a claim.
When a crime on a property kills someone, the family’s case becomes a wrongful death claim, which carries its own statute and its own filing deadline.
You may be entitled to compensation for both financial losses and personal ones.
Economic damages cover documented costs, including emergency treatment, surgery, follow-up care, future medical needs, lost wages, and lost earning capacity if you cannot return to the work you did before. Noneconomic damages cover pain and suffering, emotional distress, and the loss of activities and relationships that mattered to you.
Punitive damages are available in a narrow set of cases involving conduct worse than ordinary carelessness, while § 55-7-29 caps them at the greater of four times compensatory damages or $500,000.
One rule cuts the other way. West Virginia follows modified comparative fault, established at § 55-7-13a, with fault allocation and the bar on recovery addressed at § 55-7-13c. Fault gets assigned by percentage, your recovery drops by your share, and it disappears once your share is greater than the combined fault of everyone else.
Expect the owner’s insurer to argue you ignored an obvious danger or went somewhere you should not have been. That argument is answerable, and understanding how comparative fault works before you speak with an adjuster puts you in a stronger position.
A civil claim runs on its own track. It does not depend on a conviction, and it does not depend on an arrest. If the attacker is never identified, a claim against the property owner can still move forward. Criminal restitution, when a judge orders it, is not the same thing as civil compensation and rarely covers the full loss.
Steps that protect a claim:
Two deadlines apply. A personal injury claim generally must be filed within two years under § 55-2-12. A wrongful death claim generally must be filed within two years of the date of death under § 55-7-6.
Evidence runs out faster than the deadline does. Surveillance systems overwrite footage on cycles measured in days or weeks, and the recording that proves a camera pointed the wrong way is often gone before anyone thinks to ask for it. A written preservation request sent early can decide a case. If you are anywhere near that window, reach out to our office and we can get started on it.
A first meeting is your chance to size up a firm. Useful questions include:
At Manchin Injury Law Group, you talk to an attorney. There is no handoff to someone you have never met. If getting to an office is hard right now, we can come to your home or your hospital room.
Yes. A civil claim against a property owner is separate from any criminal case, and it does not require an arrest or a conviction. What matters is whether the owner failed to take reasonable security precautions against a foreseeable crime.
No. The two cases run independently, and waiting can cost you evidence along with time on your filing deadline. A court may pause parts of a civil case while a prosecution is active, and your lawyer can plan around that.
Va. Code § 55-2-12 sets a two-year deadline for personal injury claims, and § 55-7-6 sets two years from the date of death for wrongful death claims. Limited exceptions apply, including for injured minors, so confirm your deadline with a lawyer rather than assuming.
Sometimes, but not automatically. Under Miller v. Whitworth, a landlord owes no duty to protect tenants from third-party crime based on landlord status alone. Liability usually depends on whether the landlord’s own actions or failures created or increased the risk, such as leaving a security gate broken after repeated complaints.
That can support a claim. Installing cameras and then leaving them unmonitored, unplugged, or unrepaired may show the owner recognized a risk and failed to respond to it. Camera placement, maintenance logs, and monitoring records are often central evidence.
It helps, but it is not enough on its own. West Virginia courts have held that general knowledge of criminal activity in an area does not make a specific crime foreseeable. Evidence about prior incidents at the property itself carries far more weight.
The personal representative of the estate brings a wrongful death action under W. Va. Code § 55-7-6. Any recovery is distributed to the surviving family members the statute identifies, which can include a spouse, children, and certain other relatives.
Nothing upfront. We handle these cases on a contingency fee under our No Fee Guarantee®, which means you owe no attorney fee unless we recover money for you. The initial consultation is free.
Being hurt in a crime leaves you with questions nobody prepared you for. Who was responsible for that dark parking lot? Did the complex already knew about the broken gate? Can anything be done now that it has already happened?
Manchin Injury Law Group can look at what happened, dig into what the property owner knew, and tell you straight whether you have a claim worth pursuing. We can meet you at our Fairmont, Morgantown, or Martinsburg office, or come to your home or hospital room if travel is difficult. The consultation with a premises liability lawyer is free, and our No Fee Guarantee® means you owe no attorney fee unless we recover money for you.
Here you are a name, not a case number. Get More with Manchin, and schedule your free consultation today.
Talk to our West Virginia lawyers about your personal injury claim today by contacting us online or by calling us at (304) 944-9022.
We offer free initial consultations at our 3 office locations conveniently located in Fairmont, Morgantown and Martinsburg.
If you are unable to visit our firm, we can come to your home or hospital room.
Fill out the form below to get in touch!