When you receive medical care, you have the legal right to understand what is being done to your body and why. In West Virginia, this right is protected through informed consent laws. These laws exist to ensure patients can make thoughtful decisions about their treatment before agreeing to it.
Informed consent is not just a form you sign before a procedure. It is a legal and ethical duty that requires doctors to share meaningful information with their patients. When that does not happen, and harm occurs, it may form the basis of a medical malpractice claim in West Virginia, which a Fairmont medical malpractice lawyer often reviews.
This guide explains how informed consent works, what doctors are required to disclose, and what options may exist if your rights were not respected.
Informed consent means that a patient agrees to medical treatment only after receiving sufficient information to make an informed decision. Consent must be voluntary, informed, and given by a mentally competent patient.
A signature alone does not equal informed consent. The law focuses on whether the patient truly understood the treatment, its risks, and available alternatives before agreeing to it.
As a patient in West Virginia, you generally have the right to:
If these rights are ignored, consent may be considered invalid.
Doctors have a duty to disclose information that a reasonable patient would consider important when deciding whether to proceed with treatment.
A doctor must explain material risks. These are risks that could influence a patient’s decision. Minor or extremely rare risks may not always require disclosure, but serious or life-altering risks usually do.
Patients should understand the purpose of the treatment and what improvement is reasonably expected. Medical care cannot be guaranteed, but the intended benefit should be explained clearly.
Doctors must discuss other treatment options when they exist. This includes less invasive options, non-surgical approaches, or choosing not to proceed.
Patients should also be told what could happen if treatment is delayed or refused, including potential health consequences.
| Required Disclosure | Why It Matters |
| Material risks | help patients weigh possible harm |
| Expected benefits | Sets realistic expectations |
| Treatment alternatives | preserve patient choice |
| Risks of no treatment | Allows informed refusal |
Consent may be legally invalid if it was not truly informed or voluntary. Common situations include:
If consent is invalid, the treatment may be considered unauthorized under the law.
There are limited circumstances in which doctors may treat a patient without informed consent. These typically involve true medical emergencies where delaying care would risk serious harm or death.
In these cases, the law assumes a reasonable patient would consent to life-saving treatment.
This exception is narrow. It does not apply when a patient is stable, conscious, or able to communicate preferences.
Failure to obtain informed consent can be a separate basis for a medical malpractice claim in West Virginia. This is different from negligent treatment.
A lack of informed consent claim focuses on the decision-making process, not whether the procedure was performed correctly.
In general, a patient must show:
Some situations where informed consent issues often arise include:
Each case depends on its facts, medical records, and expert review.
If you believe a doctor failed to obtain your informed consent and you were harmed, taking early steps can help protect your options.
Start by requesting copies of your medical records. Write down what you were told before treatment and what information you believe was missing. Avoid confronting providers directly until you understand your legal rights.
Speaking with a West Virginia personal injury lawyer can help you determine whether informed consent laws may apply to your situation.
Yes. A signed form alone does not prove informed consent if a doctor failed to explain important risks, alternatives, or expected outcomes.
No. Doctors must disclose material risks that a reasonable patient would want to know before deciding whether to proceed with treatment.
Informed consent is required for most non-emergency procedures, though minor or routine treatments may involve a more limited level of disclosure.
Yes. When a patient lacks legal capacity, an authorized family member or legal representative may provide informed consent on their behalf.
West Virginia medical malpractice claims are subject to strict deadlines, making it important to seek legal guidance as soon as possible.
Informed consent laws exist to protect patient autonomy and ensure transparency in medical care. When doctors fail to explain risks, alternatives, or outcomes, patients lose the ability to make meaningful choices.
If you believe your informed consent rights were violated and you suffered harm, learning your legal options can be an important next step. A qualified medical malpractice attorney at Manchin Injury Law Group can review your situation, explain how the law applies, and help you decide how to move forward.
Attorney Timothy Manchin established the Manchin Injury Law Group in 2011 after his law partner of more than 25 years became a West Virginia circuit court judge. His focus is on helping individual clients and entire families victimized by negligent acts.
We offer a free initial consultation at our office in the Manchin Professional Building — our home since 1983 — conveniently located in Fairmont.
If you are unable to visit our firm, we can come to your home or hospital room.
Fill out the form below to get in touch!
